Legal Practice and Ethics Courses

Professor David Zarfes

The courses listed below provide a taste of the Legal Practice and Ethics courses offered at the Law School, although no formal groupings exist in our curriculum. This list includes the courses taught in the 2019-20 and 2020-21 school years. Not all of these courses are offered every year, but this list will give you a representative sample of the variety of courses we might offer over any two-year period. Other new courses will likely be offered during your time at the Law School.

PLEASE NOTE: This page does not include courses for the current academic year. To browse current course offerings, visit my.UChicago.

Abrams Environmental Law Clinic

Students in the Abrams Environmental Law Clinic promote clean energy, fight against water pollution, protect natural resources and human health, and address legacy contamination. Students learn practical legal skills, such as conducting factual investigations, interviewing witnesses and preparing affidavits, reviewing administrative determinations, drafting motions, working with experts, arguing motions and presenting at trial or an administrative hearing. The Clinic represents regional and national environmental organizations and individuals and often works with co-counsel. In addition to litigation, the Clinic may also engage in legislative reform and rule-making efforts; students interested solely in that kind of work should notify the instructor before joining the Clinic. While the course does not have any pre-requisites, students are strongly encouraged to take Environmental Law, Energy Law, and/or Administrative Law courses at some point during their time in the clinic.  A student enrolling in the Clinic for the first time should sign up for two credits; in subsequent quarters, the student may enroll for one, two or three credits per quarter after consultation with clinic faculty. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Winter 2021, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Autumn 2020, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Spring 2020, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Winter 2020, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Autumn 2019, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Winter 2019, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Autumn 2018, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Spring 2018, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Winter 2018, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock
  • Autumn 2017, Mark N. Templeton and Robert A. Weinstock

Accounting and Financial Analysis

This course is designed to quickly introduce you to (or, preferably, refresh your knowledge of) basic financial accounting [first two weeks of class] and then aims to aggressively increase your ability to be a highly sophisticated user of financial statements. After taking this course, you should improve your ability to determine a firm's accounting policy for a particular type of transaction and to determine how that policy choice affects its primary financial statements. You will also learn how to question whether these effects fairly reflect the underlying economics of the firm's transactions. Asking these questions involves an interplay between accounting, economics, finance, law and business strategy. You should therefore greatly improve your ability to use an accounting report as part of an overall assessment of the firm's strategy and the potential rewards and risks of dealing with the firm. It is REQUIRED that students registering for this course have a thorough exposure to accounting course work, at least at the level provided by the Booth course Financial Accounting (B30000). Fundamentals of Accounting for Attorneys (LAWS 79112 or 53260) does not provide a sufficient foundation for this course. Students who have not taken B30000, but feel they have taken an equivalent level of accounting coursework, must petition for a waiver from Professor Berger at Philip.berger@chicagobooth.edu.

This class has a final exam and a series of reaction papers. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Philip G. Berger
  • Spring 2020, Philip G. Berger
  • Spring 2019, Philip G. Berger
  • Spring 2018, Philip G. Berger

Advanced Advocacy: Building and Using Your Advocate's Toolbox

The seminar will illustrate the many ways in which an argument is much more than just "the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says." We will explore not only the many forms of argument (persuasion, evidence-based, push/shove, Talmudic, misdirection), but also the many considerations necessary to win (forum, timing, deposition vs. trial, insurance coverage, leverage). We will use arguably (and inarguably) the best sources to build an advocate's toolbox: classical (Bible, Talmud); historical (Gettysburg Address, Letter from a Birmingham Jail, The Murder of William of Norwich); and popular culture (My Cousin Vinny, Monty Python's Argument Clinic).  Students will use their toolbox in argument simulations, including Trolley Problem permutations, Spot the Hidden Flaw, Improv Games, Headline Rewrite, and Chess the Chicago Way. "Is this the right room for an argument?" Yes, it is. This seminar requires a series of reaction papers. Students who wish to earn three credits must also take an exam in addition to writing the papers. Participation will be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Robert David Cheifetz

Advanced Civil Procedure

This course examines salient features of major civil litigation from both a practitioner's and a policymaker's perspective. Broadly, these features fall into two categories: issues with forum and aggregation on the one hand, and problems with the collection and production of evidence on the other. Topics in the first category include class actions, multi-district litigation, and arbitration. Topics in the second category include electronic discovery, expert witnesses, and preservation of evidence. In addition, this course studies how the federal rulemaking process, statutes, and judicial decisions compete to define the procedures that govern civil litigation. The student's grade is based on a final examination with limited consideration of class participation.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, William H. J. Hubbard
  • Autumn 2018, William H. J. Hubbard
  • Autumn 2017, William H. J. Hubbard

Advanced Contracts: Contract Governance and Business Strategy

This class in advanced contracts focuses on how to negotiate, structure and govern contracts with an eye towards creating value for one's client. It covers core doctrinal concepts that strongly affect contract structure and quickly moves on to explore strategic aspects of commercial contracting including how one chooses a partner, devises a negotiation strategy, and structures the key work-a-day contract provisions that facilitate commercial cooperation, encourage product and process innovation, and lead to the creation of value creating deals. Emphasis is placed on the role that nonlegal sanctions play in contract governance and management as well as on the limits of the legal system in many contractual settings. Students will work sometimes individually, but often in teams, to complete assignments based on case studies of real deals and will write both individual and group based memoranda. There is no exam. Grading is 60% individual written work, and 40% team work (oral and written) as well as class participation. Students will have the opportunity to advise a live client on a deal, advise inside counsel on an outsourcing deal, and get feedback on a crisis management project from a leading consultant and a seasoned general counsel.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Lisa Bernstein

Advanced Legal Research

The purpose of this seminar is to enhance students' knowledge of legal sources and to develop their ability to research the law. The class will cover the basic categories of legal research in depth and with a focus on practical skills and efficiency, including statutes, administrative law, legislative history, cases, and secondary sources. This seminar also will address a series of practice areas such as corporate and securities, tax, transactional, federal procedure, and intellectual property, focusing on the substantive resources and practical research skills for each. Upon successful completion of the class, students will expand their understanding of research resources in a variety of areas, will improve their skills in using legal research tools, and will develop extensive research knowledge in at least one area from their work on a final research paper. The seminar will be limited to twenty-five students with priority to third year students. To receive credit for this course, students must complete research assignments (40 percent of grade), submit a research paper on a topic approved by the instructor (50 percent of grade), and attend and participate in course meetings (10 percent). Students may earn either 2 or 3 credits for this seminar depending upon the number and nature of assignments completed and the length of their final paper. A 20-25 page paper will be required for the 3-credit option for this course. For the 2-credit option for this seminar, students will write a 10-15 page paper. In the research paper, the student should extensively and comprehensively address sources for researching the topic, discuss successful and less useful techniques, and recommend research strategies.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Sheri Lewis
  • Autumn 2020, Todd Ito and Scott Vanderlin
  • Winter 2020, Scott Vanderlin and Todd Ito
  • Autumn 2019, Todd Ito
  • Winter 2019, Sheri Lewis
  • Autumn 2018, Todd Ito
  • Winter 2018, Sheri Lewis
  • Autumn 2017, Todd Ito

Advanced Legal Writing

This course will prepare law students for the working world by honing writing skills for briefs, memoranda, motions, and contracts. We will discuss and practice the major principles of legal writing in plain English -- no jargon, no legalese, no anachronistic fluff. In addition to fine-tuning basic and more advanced writing skills, students will learn how to use their writing to win arguments, persuade clients and sharpen their thinking. The class will function largely as a workshop where we analyze the impact of various writing styles. Regular attendance is essential. Through exercises and group critiques, students will learn to write more succinctly and effectively. Better writers make better lawyers. The course concludes with an eight-hour final examination, which determines the student's grade. Students must complete all assignments before the exam period begins. This course satisfies the Writing Project writing requirement. Legal Research and Writing is a pre-requisite.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Elizabeth Duquette
  • Spring 2020, Elizabeth Duquette
  • Spring 2019, Elizabeth Duquette
  • Spring 2018, Elizabeth Duquette

Advanced Restructuring Practice: Legal and Financial Strategies

Complex corporate restructurings will almost always involve a mix of legal, business, and financial advice. This seminar will focus on identifying practical issues faced by restructuring lawyers in connection with fundamental aspects of restructuring practice, including: (i) identifying a capital structure, capital structure problems, and their solutions; (ii) the key legal relationships between a borrower and its creditors and between the creditors themselves; (iii) what happens when a borrower is running out of cash; and (iv) the recent trend in so-called "Liability Management" transactions. This class requires a series of reaction papers. Participation may be considered in final grading. Prerequisites: Bankruptcy (recommended but not required); Secured Transactions (recommended but not required.)

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Ryan Preston Dahl

Applied Entrepreneurship: Tackling Legal Problems with Business Solutions

Professor Henderson (Law School) and Professor Gossin (Polsky Center) will provide students with a systematic approach to entrepreneurship, and then help lead teams of students through the process of generating ideas, turning ideas into businesses, testing business concepts with customers, prototyping businesses, and pitching business ideas to investors. The students will take their ideas out into the market with the goal of building real businesses. The focus will be on addressing legal, regulatory, or public policy problems with business solutions. Law students tend to think of legal solutions to these problems, policy students tend to think of policy solutions to these problems, while business students apply entrepreneurial solutions solely to business problems. The goal of the course is to marry legal and policy problems with business solutions by putting together teams from the Law School, Harris School, and Booth School. While students will be encouraged to identify legal, regulatory, or policy problems that need to be addressed, special emphasis will be given to those teams aiming to address problems facing underserved communities, whether this involves improving access to justice, reducing regulatory barriers that raise the costs of service, or the like. The course will meet nine times in the Fall to provide the core tools of entrepreneurship. During this time, students will also work with the professors and colleagues to identify potential business ideas. In the Winter, teams will be formed and begin to conceptualize their business model, including doing qualitative research and prototyping. There will be occasional meetings for teams to present their ideas to the group and for teams to be reconstituted to focus on the promising ideas. During this process, some ideas may drop out, and these teams be added to other teams. If there are viable business ideas developed, they can move forward with various VC challenges. Participation may be included in final grading.

Previously:

  • Winter 2020, M. Todd Henderson, Thomas William Gossin-Wilson
  • Autumn 2019, M. Todd Henderson, Thomas William Gossin-Wilson

Arbitration

This is an advanced seminar on arbitration in the United States. We will survey issues raised by federal and state courts' interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Each week will explore a distinct theme, such as federalism, public policy, or consumer contracting. We will explore questions such as: Should the FAA apply equally in state as in federal court? Are state laws prohibiting arbitration of sexual harassment claims preempted? When can a court refuse to enforce an arbitration agreement? The course will also introduce economic theories to analyze these questions. Students will be evaluated according to their participation in class and brief reaction papers that respond to each week's readings (2 credits). Students who want to earn 3 credits must also submit a substantial paper in addition to the weekly reaction papers as part of their evaluation. In the last two sessions, students will present and discuss their final papers.

Previously:

  • Spring 2020, Sarath Sanga

Bioethics

This lecture course will introduce you to the field of Bioethics. We will use a case-based method to study how different philosophical and theological traditions describe and defend differences in moral choices in contemporary bioethics. This class is based on the understanding that case narratives serve as the motivation for the discipline of bioethics and that complex ethical issues are best considered by a careful examination of the competing theories as they work themselves out in specific cases. We will examine both classic cases that have shaped our understanding of the field of bioethics and cases that are newly emerging, including the case of research done at Northwestern University. Through these cases, we will ask how religious traditions both collide and cohere over such topics as embryo research, health care reform, terminal illness, issues in epidemics and public health, and our central research question, synthetic biology research.

This class will also explore how the discipline of bioethics has emerged to reflect upon such dilemmas, with particular attention to the role that theology philosophy, law, public health, and religious studies have played in such reflection. We will look at both how the practice of different disciplines has shaped the field of bioethics and in particular at how different theological and philosophical claims, methodology, and praxis have continued to shape and inflect bioethics. We will examine the issue of epistemic stance, of truth claims, and of how normative policies are created amid serious controversy. We will explore the nature of the relationship between religion and public policy and study how religious traditions and moral philosophy shape our view of issues as "bioethics controversies" to be addressed.

Previously:

  • Spring 2020, Laurie Zoloth, Ranana Leigh Dine, Daniel Takarabe Kim, and Miriam Yonati Attia

Brief-writing and Appellate Advocacy Seminar

This seminar will be devoted to the art of brief-writing and appellate advocacy. Topics will include how to select the best arguments, how to choose a theme and structure the facts and the argument, and how to write the brief in a way that it is clear, concise and persuasive on the first read. Grades will be based on two papers -- an opening brief and a reply.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2019, Michele Odorizzi
  • Winter 2019, Michele Odorizzi
  • Winter 2018, Michele Odorizzi

Business Planning

This seminar develops and applies the student's knowledge of taxation and corporate and securities law in the solution of a series of transactional problems involving typical steps in business formation and rearrangement. The problems include the formation of a closely held company; the transition to public ownership of the corporation; executive compensation arrangements; the purchase and sale of a business; and mergers, tender offers, and other types of combination transactions. Small-group discussions and lectures are employed. The student's grade is based on a final examination; students may earn an additional credit by writing a paper on a topic approved by the instructors. The student must have taken (or be taking concurrently) Business Organizations and Corporate Tax I or receive instructor approval.

Previously:

  • Winter 2020, Keith Crow and Anthony Sexton
  • Winter 2018, Keith Crow and Anthony Sexton

Case Studies in Professional Responsibility

The course will provide case studies in professional responsibility including a deep dive into issues that new and experienced lawyers will revisit on a regular basis, such as conflicts of interest and confidentiality, as well as the responsibilities that each practitioner owes to the profession and each other. The course will satisfy the Professional Responsibility curriculum requirement. We will focus on ethical dilemmas that are likely to arise early in your legal careers and ground our discussion with reference to the Rules of Professional Conduct. This class will have a final exam and reaction papers. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Amelia Dolores Runyan
  • Spring 2020, Amelia Dolores Runyan

Civil Rights Clinic: Police Accountability

The Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project (PAP) is one of the nation's leading law civil rights clinics focusing on issues of criminal justice. Through the lens of live-client work, students examine how and where litigation fits into broader efforts to improve police accountability and ultimately the criminal justice system. Students provide legal services to indigent victims of police abuse in federal and state courts. They litigate civil rights cases at each level of the court system from trial through appeals. Some students also represent children and adults in related juvenile or criminal defense matters. Students take primary responsibility for all aspects of the litigation, including client counseling, fact investigation, case strategy, witness interviews, legal research, pleadings and legal memoranda, discovery, depositions, motion practice, evidentiary hearings, trials, and appeals. A significant amount of legal writing is expected. Students work in teams on cases or projects, and meet with the instructor on at minimum a weekly basis. Students also take primary responsibility for the Clinic's policy and public education work. PAP teaches students to apply and critically examine legal theory in the context of representation of people in need. It teaches students to analyze how and why individual cases of abuse occur and to connect them to systemic problems, often leading to "public impact" litigation and other strategies for policy reform. Through our immersion in live client work, we engage fundamental issues of race, class, and gender, and their intersection with legal institutions. We instruct students in legal ethics and advocacy skills. And we seek to instill in them a public service ethos, as they begin their legal careers. Students are required to complete, prior to their third year, Evidence, Criminal Procedure I, and the Intensive Trial Practice Workshop. Constitutional Law III is also recommended. Standards for evaluation are posted on Canvas.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Craig Futterman
  • Winter 2021, Craig Futterman
  • Autumn 2020, Craig Futterman
  • Spring 2020, Craig Futterman
  • Winter 2020, Craig Futterman
  • Winter 2019, Craig Futterman
  • Autumn 2019, Craig Futterman
  • Spring 2019, Craig Futterman
  • Winter 2019, Craig Futterman
  • Autumn 2018, Craig Futterman
  • Spring 2018, Craig Futterman
  • Winter 2018, Craig Futterman
  • Autumn 2017, Craig Futterman

Civil Rights Practicum

In this practicum, students will engage in a range of research and analysis under the supervision of Prof. Huq, in relation to a number of active civil rights cases or other matters. Initial projects will include work on hate-crimes regulation. The aim is to cultivate experience in litigation and advocacy-related tasks in a real world setting, albeit without the structured format of a clinic. Students will be evaluated based on written work, collaboration, and analysis.Questions should be directed to Prof. Huq.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Aziz Huq
  • Winter 2021, Aziz Huq
  • Spring 2019, Aziz Huq
  • Winter 2019, Aziz Huq
  • Autumn 2018, Aziz Huq
  • Spring 2018, Aziz Huq
  • Winter 2018, Aziz Huq
  • Autumn 2017, Aziz Huq

Class Action Controversies

The purpose of this seminar is to understand the rules applicable to class action litigation, the major doctrinal and policy issues that influence class action litigation, and the strategic, ethical, and practical considerations that judges, class counsel, and litigants face in class action litigation. Each week, we will address topics in class action law that bear on these issues.

The seminar is offered for two credits, with students completing 2-3 reaction papers. As an alternative, the class is also offered for three credits with students completing a substantial writing project. Students completing the three credit option can receive writing project credit. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Michael T. Brody
  • Autumn 2019, Michael T. Brody

Communications and Advocacy for Lawyers

No skill is more important for a lawyer than communication, and this is especially true when lawyers are engaged in public advocacy. Students in this hands-on seminar will develop skills in writing, analysis, and presentation geared toward advocacy. Students will take on the role of a spokesperson for an organization (non-profit, business, or law firm) and learn to advocate for that organization though writing op-eds, press releases, blog posts, and communications plans; preparing and delivering a presentation and slide decks; and engaging through media interviews and crisis communications. Topics covered will include creating and adjusting communications based on audience and medium; writing persuasively, especially for non-legal audiences; communications plan development, media training, and public speaking with and without preparation. Students will be expected to speak before the class and outsiders, write on a weekly basis, and edit each other's work. Students will be graded on quality of work product, participation in class, and improvement over the class time, with the majority of the grade coming from a final presentation and slide deck and a capstone communications plan.

Previously:

  • Winter 2020, Marsha Nagorsky
  • Winter 2019, Marsha Nagorsky
  • Winter 2018, Marsha Nagorsky

Constitutional Decisionmaking

Students enrolled in the seminar will work as "courts" consisting of five "Justices" each. During each of the first eight weeks of the quarter, each court will be assigned two hypothetical cases raising issues under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. All cases must be decided with opinion (concurring and dissenting opinions are permitted). The decisions may be premised on the "legislative history" of the Equal Protection Clause (materials on that history will be provided) and on any doctrines or precedents created by the "Justices" themselves. The "Justices" may not rely, however, on any actual decisions of the United States Supreme Court. The seminar is designed to give students some insight into the problems a Justice confronts in collaborating with colleagues, interpreting an ambiguous constitutional provision, and then living with the doctrines and precedents he or she creates. Enrollment will be limited to three courts. Since the members of each court must work together closely under rigid time constraints, students must sign up as five-person courts. This seminar will not have regularly-scheduled classes (except for introductory and concluding meetings), but you should not underestimate the time demands. It is a very demanding seminar. If more than three courts sign up, I will select the participating courts by lot. To be eligible for participation in the seminar, students should send me an e-mail (gstone@uchicago.edu), including the names and e-mail addresses of all five "Justices." This seminar will not have regularly-scheduled classes (except for an introductory meeting), but you should not underestimate the time demands. It is a very demanding seminar. If more than three courts sign up, I will select the participating courts by lot and I will email you to let you know whether your court has been selected. To be eligible for participation in the seminar, students should send me an e-mail (gstone@uchicago.edu) by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, November 6, including the names and e-mail addresses of all five "Justices." If more than four courts sign up, I will select the participating courts by lot and I will email you by Monday, November 9, to let you know whether your court has been selected. This class will have varied meeting dates determined by the faculty member, but will still have the equivalent meeting times and out of class work required for a 3 credit seminar.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Geoffrey R. Stone
  • Spring 2020, Geoffrey R. Stone
  • Winter 2019, Geoffrey R. Stone
  • Spring 2018, Geoffrey R. Stone

The Constitutional Rights of Minors from the Minors' Point of View

This seminar will be offered to a small group of law students who will co-teach a group of high school students who are currently in the custody of Illinois's Juvenile Justice System. Each law student will be paired with one or two high school students living in and attending school in a juvenile facility and will be responsible for supporting those students' learning, commenting on their weekly work, and co-running weekly small group sessions. Law Students will also be expected to participate in additional group meetings with Professor Buss to plan the curriculum and discuss the insights gained from the class, and in individual meetings with the high school students as part of the teaching process. The seminar will meet on Tuesday mornings from 9:00 to 11:00 to accommodate the needs of the high school students. Additional meetings will be scheduled to accommodate the schedules of enrolled law students, high school students and Professor Buss. Priority will be given to Law Students enrolled in Con Law VII, to increase the law students' expertise on the topics addressed in the High School seminar and to enrich the learning in Con Law VII. If any students not enrolled in Con Law VII are enrolled in the seminar, they will be expected to do additional reading to prepare them for the seminar sessions. Topics will include: Young peoples' rights in the juvenile justice system, minors' right to control medical and reproductive decisions, and high school students' religious and speech rights , due process rights, and rights against search and seizure in school. Law Students' writing will consist of weekly response papers addressing high school students' participation and reflecting upon the high school students' contributions. Advance approval by Emily Buss is required., and space is limited. If you are interested, please contact her by email at ebussdos@uchicago.edu at your earliest convenience. Students interested in taking it for 3 credits will write an additional 10-15 page paper.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Emily Buss
  • Autumn 2019, Emily Buss
  • Winter 2018, Emily Buss
  • Autumn 2018, Emily Buss

Contract Drafting and Review

This seminar will serve as an introduction to contracting drafting and how such drafting differs from other types of legal writing. We will start with the basic "anatomy of a contract," discussing the meaning, use and effect of various provisions. The seminar will address not only legal drafting issues, but also how to understand a client's practical business needs in order to effectively use the contract as a planning and problem solving tool. Students will draft specific contract provisions and a complete contract, and will learn how to read, review and analyze contracts with an eye toward both legal and business risk issues. Many/most of the exercises simulate working with a fictional client.  Grades will be based upon class participation, a series of substantial out-of-class weekly drafting exercises, and a final take-home assignment.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Joan E. Neal
  • Winter 2021, Joan E. Neal and Michelle M. Drake
  • Autumn 2020, Joan E. Neal
  • Spring 2020, Joan E. Neal
  • Winter 2020, Joan E. Neal
  • Autumn 2019, Joan E. Neal
  • Spring 2019, Joan E. Neal
  • Winter 2019, Joan E. Neal
  • Autumn 2018, Joan E. Neal
  • Spring 2018, Joan E. Neal
  • Winter 2018, Joan E. Neal
  • Autumn 2017, Joan E. Neal

Contract Governance

This seminar explores the legal and non-legal provisions and forces (including norms, networks, and ancillary contract administration programs and documents) that are used to govern contractual performance and encourage innovation in contracts in the modern economy. Although theoretically grounded in typical Chicago fashion, the focus is on the practical aspects of contracting, from selecting a supplier, to negotiating a deal, to dealing with crisis management, to governing an ongoing relationship, to thinking about the choice of forum for the resolution of different kinds of disputes. Students will work both individually and in teams, and attention will be paid to how to organize and motivate team work, a key skill in the modern law firm.

Students will have the opportunity to get feedback on their work from both the professor and outside visitors. They will review their work on crisis management with a leading consultant and former general counsel of a large company. They will advise a live client on a contract and get feedback on the wisdom of their advice. There is no long paper, but rather short assignments of various types. This class will be graded 60% written work, and 40% class participation as this is a skills class.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Lisa Bernstein
  • Spring 2020, Lisa Bernstein

Contract Law for LLM Students

The materials for this course give overview of key topics in US contract law (especially those that are most practice relevant but difficult like interpretation and damages) but the course devotes much of its in-class zoom time to subjects more directly relevant to the practice of contract law including: how to choose a contracting partner who can innovate, different approaches to negotiating agreements that will work well in practice, how to review and draft actual agreements (focusing on both procurement and biotechnology agreements), how to choose the law and dispute resolution forum best suited to the transaction, and how to deal with crises caused by a company's contracting partners. Attention is also paid to how to use both legal and nonlegal sanctions and a variety of monitoring mechanism to induce contractual performance. Students will do some work individually and some in groups (both in and out of class). Grade is part class participation/group work and part individual written assignments. There is no exam. This course does not directly prepare students for the bar, although optional videos that will aid in that endeavor are provided for those who seek this type of learning.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Lisa Bernstein
  • Spring 2020, Lisa Bernstein
  • Spring 2019, Lisa Bernstein
  • Spring 2018, Lisa Bernstein

Corporate Compliance and Business Integration

This seminar explores the rapidly expanding scope of Corporate Compliance across industries and the evolving role of corporate compliance officers as business partners and culture champions.  Study begins with a foundational overview of the relevant legal and policy mandates, proceeds to explore Corporate Compliance's role in operational oversight and risk mitigation, and finishes with an examination of Corporate Compliance's evolving role in enterprise risk, strategy and culture.

The first section of the course will provide insight into the legal, regulatory and risk management considerations that have driven business organizations to develop and enhance their internal programs for identifying and managing compliance risks.  The second section will focus on case studies from different industries, and from the separate perspectives of business leaders, regulators, consumers and employees. The final section of the course will focus on the intersection of compliance and organizational culture, and illustrate how to leverage the tools of policy, training, and leadership engagement to build cultures of integrity. 

The course will include academic, regulatory and business readings as well as interactive case studies, where students will apply practical solutions to real risk and corporate integrity challenges faced by multinational organizations in a variety of sectors and explore the consequences for the compliance function.

Student evaluation is based on: 3-part Group Project on a corporate compliance program's response to a series of hypotheticals.  Each student in the group will serve as a main presenter once.  Each group assignment is accompanied by a short (3-5 pages) supplemental paper to be completed individually by each group member. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Forrest James Deegan
  • Autumn 2019, Forrest James Deegan
  • Autumn 2018, Forrest James Deegan

Criminal and Juvenile Justice Project Clinic

The Project provides law and social work students the supervised opportunity to represent children and young adults accused of crime in juvenile and criminal court. Representation includes addressing the social, psychological and educational needs of our clients and their families. In addition to direct representation, students are involved in policy reform and public education including work with coalitions on issues of juvenile life without parole, youth violence, mass incarceration, and the collateral consequences of conviction. Students will participate in case selection and litigation strategies. Students will be expected to do legal research and writing including drafting motions and memoranda on various legal issues, i.e. evidentiary questions, sentencing, etc. and brief writing. Additionally, students will do pre-trial investigation and fact development including interviewing clients and witnesses. 3L students who have taken a trial practice course will have the opportunity to argue motions and second chair hearings and trials. Policy work will include general research on issues, drafting statement and position papers and attendance at meetings. Corequisites: Evidence is recommended, but not required. Trial Practice is a corequisite for rising 3L's. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Winter 2021, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Autumn 2020, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Spring 2020, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Winter 2020, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Autumn 2019, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Spring 2019, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Winter 2019, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Autumn 2018, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers
  • Spring 2018, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers and Randolph Stone
  • Winter 2018, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers and Randolph Stone
  • Autumn 2017, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers and Randolph Stone

Divorce Practice and Procedure

This is a simulation class providing exposure to the dynamic process of representing clients in dissolution of marriage cases and issues related to them.  The class will make you aware of the complexities arising when the ever-changing family unit becomes divided.  Topics are covered through an evolving case, with each student in the role of a practicing lawyer.  Issues include interstate and international parental kidnapping, determination of jurisdiction, domestic violence, restraining orders and injunctions, temporary and permanent parenting rights and responsibilities (custody and visitation), temporary and permanent maintenance (alimony), child support, the characterization of property and division of assets and liabilities; also, premarital and post marital agreements, ethical issues, federal tax law affecting divorce and the effects of bankruptcy. A series of reaction papers will be required. Participation may be considered in final grading. There are no required prerequisites, but experiencing a basic family law course would be helpful.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Donald Schiller and Erika Walsh
  • Autumn 2019, Donald Schiller and Erika Walsh
  • Autumn 2018, Donald Schiller and Erika Walsh
  • Autumn 2017, Donald Schiller and Erika Walsh

Drafting Contracts: The Problem of Ambiguity

This seminar is unique. It is a very interesting, very intellectual, and very practical learning experience. The main features are: 1. Students will learn some extremely useful tools for analyzing and drafting contracts. They will acquire them by an inductive process of reviewing many examples of ambiguity from case law, eminent legal scholars, and the lecturer's practice. They will learn to identify and eliminate ambiguity in drafting contracts. These tools are the creation of the lecturer and will give students unique practical skills that no other American law students (except the lecturer's prior students) have. 2. The course materials come from the in-house seminars for the firm's China Practice lawyers that the lecturer conducted for many years as a partner at Baker & McKenzie and that established the profession's best practices for China-related contracts. 3. The historical examples of ambiguity in the seminar are of human, as well as intellectual, interest. They show that ambiguity can lead to the hanging of an individual for piracy or treason, a damages award of more than U.S. $10 billion, and even a change in the course of World War II. 4. The seminar facilitates student learning. At the beginning of each class, an audience response system ("clickers") provides students immediate, comparative, and anonymous feedback on their understanding of the reading assignment. The course also allows each student to see what he or she has learned in the course by comparing his or her analysis of a specific contract for the first class and for the last class. This contract analysis, like the final exam, gives each student the experience of a practicing lawyer reviewing a contract. Grades will be based on a proctored in-class final exam.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2019, Preston Mccullough Torbert

Editing and Advocacy

Good editors see not just the sentence that was written but the sentence that might have been written. They must be able to look past words and arguments that don't need to be there and at the same time summon up ones that haven't yet appeared. Their value comes not just from preventing mistakes but by finding a place for style, structure, evidence, voice, insight, precision, clarity-all the things that make a piece of writing persuasive. This course will teach you how to be one of those editors. You'll edit briefs. You'll edit contracts. You'll edit all kinds of legal documents. Sometimes this editing will occur during in-class exercises. Sometimes it will occur through short, weekly assignments. But always the goal will be the same: learn and practice a skill that is fundamental to becoming an excellent advocate. This course requires a series of reaction papers. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Patrick James Barry

Entrepreneurship and the Law

This seminar examines how the law and legal counsel influence innovation and entrepreneurship in the US, including by micro-enterprises and high-growth disruptors. The seminar explores the position of the entrepreneur in society, in the economy, and in our constitutional framework, in order to analyze the entrepreneur's fundamental legal needs. We survey legal questions particular to start-ups, including strategies for structuring a business organization, financing, and protecting intellectual property. Assignments require students to research issues that apply to hypothetical and real start-ups and practice lawyerly skills like strategic planning, negotiation, drafting, and counseling. Students' grades will be based on active participation, short written assignments, and a research paper. Students who have taken LAWS 53188 The Lawyer as an Entrepreneur: Analyzing & Evaluating Early-Stage Ventures may not enroll in this class.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Elizabeth Kregor
  • Winter 2020, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Autumn 2018, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Autumn 2017, Salen Churi, Elizabeth Kregor, and Amy Hermalik

Estate Planning and Drafting

This seminar in estate planning and drafting meets the ABA definition of an experiential course. The seminar will give students experience in drafting specific provisions of wills and trust instruments, including provisions relating to the use of class gifts, conditions of survival, and powers of appointment. The seminar also will give students the experience of drafting a will for a live client. Students will be graded on a series of experiential assignments, including the will-drafting project, and on class participation. Prerequisite: Trusts and Estates: Wealth Management and Transmission (LAWS 45211). Students who took Advanced Trusts and Estates (LAWS 45221) in Spring Quarter 2019 are not eligible to enroll.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Thomas Gallanis Jr.
  • Spring 2020, Thomas Gallanis Jr.

Ethics for Transactional Lawyers

This class will focus on ethical issues faced by transactional lawyers.  We will consider the role of a transactional lawyer, the various sources of guidance for transactional lawyers, the intersection of personal morality and rules-based ethics, individual and organizational practice pressures that can cause lawyers to violate ethics norms, how to weigh competing ethical obligations, and select ethics issues faced by transactional laywers in practice (including, e.g.,  ethics issues arising when drafting contracts, negotiating agreements, conducting due diligence, and providing opinion letters).  Grades will be based upon active class participation in discussions and simulations, plus 5 short research papers.  (Please note that the papers cannot fulfill the SRP or WP requirement.)

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Joan E. Neal
  • Winter 2020, Joan E. Neal
  • Winter 2019, Joan E. Neal

Exoneration Project Clinic

The Exoneration Project is a post-conviction clinical project that represents people convicted of crimes of which they are innocent. Students working in our Project assist in every aspect of representation including selecting cases, advising clients, investigating and developing evidence, drafting pleadings, making oral arguments, examining witnesses at evidentiary hearings, and appellate litigation. Through participation in our Project, students explore issues of error and inequality in the criminal justice system, including police and prosecutorial misconduct, the use of faulty scientific evidence, coerced confessions, unreliable eyewitness testimony, and ineffective assistance of counsel. The Exoneration Project is an intensive, rigorous experience designed for students who are committed to providing the best possible representation to deserving clients. Second-year students wishing to enroll in the Project are encouraged to take Evidence in their second year. Third-year students are required to complete, prior to their third year, Evidence and the Intensive Trial Practice Workshop (although we recognize that that may not be possible under current circumstances). Students are also strongly encouraged but not required to take Criminal Procedure I and II. Students will receive credit for the work they do in accordance with the credit rules for all other clinical programs. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Russel Ainsworth, Karl Arthur Leonard, and Lauren Myerscough-Mueller
  • Winter 2021, Russel Ainsworth, Karl Arthur Leonard, and Lauren Myerscough-Mueller
  • Autumn 2020, Russel Ainsworth, Karl Arthur Leonard, and Lauren Myerscough-Mueller
  • Spring 2020, Joshua Tepfer, Karl Arthur Leonard, and Russel Ainsworth
  • Winter 2020, Joshua Tepfer, Karl Arthur Leonard, and Russel Ainsworth
  • Autumn 2019, Joshua Tepfer, Karl Arthur Leonard, and Russel Ainsworth
  • Spring 2019, Tara Thompson, David Owens, and Joshua Tepfer
  • Winter 2019, Tara Thompson, David Owens, Joshua Tepfer, Russell Ainsworth, and Karl Leonard
  • Autumn 2018, Tara Thompson, David Owens, Joshua Tepfer, Russell Ainsworth, and Karl Leonard
  • Spring 2018, Tara Thompson, David Owens, Joshua Tepfer, and Russell Ainsworth
  • Winter 2018, Tara Thompson, David Owens, Joshua Tepfer, and Russell Ainsworth
  • Autumn 2017, Tara Thompson, David Owens, Joshua Tepfer, and Russell Ainsworth

Federal Criminal Justice Clinic

The Federal Criminal Justice Clinic is the first law school clinic in the country to focus on representing indigent clients charged with federal felonies. The FCJC gives students a unique opportunity to represent individual clients in federal court. FCJC students also engage in policy advocacy and systemic reform efforts, with a focus on combatting racial disparities and racially discriminatory practices. The FCJC is currently leading a Federal Bail Reform Project through which students have engaged in legislative advocacy before Congress and have created the first federal courtwatching initiative in the country.

The FCJC litigates in federal district court in Chicago, before the Seventh Circuit, and in the U.S. Supreme Court. In our district court litigation, FCJC students may have an opportunity to interview clients and witnesses; meet with clients; conduct and participate in hearings and trials; research, write, and argue motions and briefs; and participate in case investigations. During the pandemic, FCJC students have continued representing clients virtually and have litigated numerous successful motions for compassionate release. Students involved in appellate litigation write briefs to the Seventh Circuit and the Supreme Court and may conduct oral argument in the Seventh Circuit.

The FCJC seminar includes skills exercises, simulations, lectures, case rounds, guest speakers, and discussions. The pre-requisites/co-requisites are Professor Siegler's Criminal Procedure II course, Evidence, and Criminal Procedure I; these courses may be taken at any time during 2L or 3L year. It is strongly recommended that students interested in joining the FCJC take a trial advocacy course. The FCJC is a year-long clinic. First priority is given to 3Ls; the remaining slots go to 2Ls. Students who want to learn more about the FCJC or who have questions about the enrollment requirements may contact Prof. Siegler or Prof. Zunkel.

Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Alison Siegler, Erica Kristine Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller
  • Winter 2021, Alison Siegler, Erica Kristine Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller
  • Autumn 2020, Alison Siegler, Erica Kristine Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller
  • Spring 2020, Alison Siegler, Erica Kristine Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller
  • Winter 2020, Alison Siegler, Erica Kristine Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller
  • Autumn 2019, Alison Siegler, Erica Kristine Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller
  • Spring 2019, Alison Siegler
  • Winter 2019, Alison Siegler, Erica K. Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller
  • Autumn 2018, Alison Siegler, Erica K. Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller
  • Spring 2018, Alison Siegler, Erica K. Zunkel, and James R. DuBray
  • Winter 2018, Alison Siegler, Erica K. Zunkel, and James R. DuBray
  • Autumn 2017, Alison Siegler, Erica K. Zunkel, and Judith P. Miller

Federal Criminal Justice Practice and Issues

This practice-oriented course integrates instruction on federal pretrial criminal procedures and issues with student practice exercises overseen by the instructor. The course will cover federal criminal practice from investigation up to trial, utilizing examples from recent federal criminal investigations and cases. The course will provide opportunities for student performance to develop professional skills and understanding. In particular, the course will provide instruction on (i) federal investigations and related issues (including Grand Jury proceedings and witness immunity); (ii) corporate internal investigations; (iii) federal charging decisions; (iv) initial appearances following arrest and accompanying bail/detention hearings (v) discovery under the federal criminal rules; (vi) pretrial motions and practice; and (vii) plea agreements. Students will engage in periodic practice simulations related to the pretrial stages of a federal criminal case. For example, students will conduct mock witness interviews in the context of a corporate internal investigation, present motions and arguments seeking, and objecting to, pretrial detention, and present motions and argument seeking to exclude or admit evidence. The course thus will provide opportunities for oral and written advocacy focusing on federal criminal pretrial practice. Each class session will also include discussion of practical and strategic issues facing both the defense and the prosecution under real-world circumstances at each pretrial stage. A student's grade will be based on class participation and written and oral performance in the simulated practice exercises.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Michael Doss
  • Winter 2020, Michael Doss
  • Winter 2019, Michael Doss
  • Winter 2018, Michael Doss

Fundamentals of In-House Counsel

The role of in-house counsel is both complex and complicated, and can be vastly rewarding to the attorney who understands its realities and can apply the law in a practical manner to support an enterprise and its leadership.  This course will help students explore and learn the fundamentals critical to succeeding as inside counsel.  Through a combination of review and discussion of influential written work of preeminent past and present in-house lawyers, discussion of case studies focused on contemporary scenarios faced by inside counsel, analysis and evaluation of risk issues in specific contracts, in-class simulations and team exercises, and guest speakers who will share their experiences and talk about their career paths, including successes and failures along the way, you will obtain an understanding of the modern view of inside counsel from a variety of diverse vantage points.

The primary focus will be on beginning to understand the critical skills necessary to prepare to succeed as in-house counsel in a large U.S. private or public company setting.  We will seek to answer questions such as: How does working in-house compare and contrast to working at a law firm, what are the day-to-day challenges experienced by inside counsel and what are strategies to meet them and excel, how has the in-house counsel role evolved over time, and what does the future hold for attorneys serving as in-house counsel.  From the student who aspires to one day be an in-house attorney, to the student who plans to serve in-house counsel while working at a law firm, Fundamentals of In-House Counsel will provide a multitude of candid and practical perspectives on the critical means by which the law supports today's American enterprises.

Grading will be based on in-class performance and a series of reflection papers.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, David Jeffrey Zarfes, Joshua Evan Avratin, and Nathan Lawrence Lutz

Global Human Rights Clinic

The Global Human Rights Clinic works for the promotion of social and economic justice around the world and in the United States. The Clinic uses international human rights laws and norms, transnational and comparative law, and multidimensional strategies to draw attention to human rights violations, develop practical solutions and promote accountability on the part of state and non-state actors. The Clinic works with clients and organizational partners through advocacy campaigns, research and litigation in domestic, foreign, and international tribunals. Working in project teams, students develop and hone essential lawyering skills, including oral advocacy, fact-finding, research, legal and non-legal writing, interviewing, media advocacy, cultural competency and strategic thinking. Students may enroll for up to three credits a quarter. New students should plan to take the clinic for three quarters for a minimum of two credits each quarter, unless they have faculty permission prior to registration. Participation may be considered in final grading. Prerequisites: International Human Rights Law (recommended but not required); Public International Law (recommended but not required) *This clinic will have limited in person meetings.

 

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Claudia Maria Flores and Mariana Olaizola Rosenblat
  • Winter 2021, Claudia Maria Flores and Mariana Olaizola Rosenblat
  • Autumn 2020, Claudia Maria Flores and Mariana Olaizola Rosenblat

Government Integrity and Transparency Seminar

The new Seminar on Government Integrity and Transparency will provide students with an opportunity to learn about the legal systems that promote government integrity and transparency through participation in a seminar and a field placement in a government oversight agency or entity.

The goal of this new course offering is to familiarize students with the legal rules, policies, and procedures for ensuring the proper, transparent functioning of governmental operations. The seminar will provide students with exposure to substantive and procedural law, criminal and administrative law, ethics, litigation preparation and practice (through participation in classroom exercises built around a single public corruption matter), and hands-on experience through a field placement.

Each student in the seminar will be responsible for securing a field placement and participating in a pre-screened field placement program with a governmental entity with oversight and transparency responsibilities during the Spring Quarter 2021.

Through a working case study, students will have an opportunity to build investigative and reasoning skills. This class requires weekly written assignments. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Sharon Renee Fairley
  • Spring 2020, Sharon Renee Fairley

Hacking for Defense

H4D is an opportunity to work with teams at the Defense Department and the various intelligence agencies (e.g., NSA, CIA) to solve real world operational problems. Started at Stanford, this program is now offered at several universities across the country. DoD chose Chicago as a new midwest site. Students will form teams with students in other departments, and teams will be assigned to/choose a project to work on. The learning will be through a flipped classroom--the lecture content is in the form of videos done by the program sponsors at Stanford and the DoD. (They are very good.) Then, we will meet as a class to discuss the materials and work together in our teams. Students will be paired with a program sponsor from the government, and work toward a solution that can be deployed. Time will be spent doing interviews, field visits, and problem solving with your team. This will require far more work than the typical law school course, but it will be much more interesting and have real world impact. There is the possibility of forming a business venture and entering the New Venture Challenge with the team. Previous ideas that have come out of H4D have helped the SEALS improve their training, the Army increase the efficiency of its supply chain, and the Navy develop a better communications device for sub-surface warfare. Check out some of the team videos online for examples. This seminar has extra time built into the meetings, but not all sessions will cover that entire time. Ultimately the class time will be the equivalent of two hours each week. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, M. Todd Henderson and Thomas William Gossin-Wilson

Hopi/Alaska Law Practicum

The Hopi Clerkship is a year-long opportunity for students to get first-hand experience with the complex challenges and unique opportunities present in the everyday work of contemporary tribal legal systems. Students will support the Hopi tribe in three distinct ways: (1) serving as law clerks to justices of the Hopi Appellate Court, doing legal research, writing bench memoranda, participating in conferences, and drafting opinions on live cases; (2) serving as law clerks to the criminal trial court judge, especially on matters related to the application of federal Fourth Amendment law to tribal police; and (3) serving as legal advisors to the Office of Cultural Preservation, working to support investigations and prosecution of Hopi cultural claims around the world in an attempt to return tribal patrimony. Students will do all their coursework and assigned casework at the University of Chicago with site visits to the respective Hopi legal institutions to attend oral arguments, present findings to Hopi tribal officials, and participate in judicial deliberations.  Co-requisite: American Indian Law

Previously:

  • Spring 2020, M. Todd Henderson
  • Winter 2020, M. Todd Henderson
  • Autumn 2019, M. Todd Henderson
  • Winter 2018, M. Todd Henderson and Justin Richland
  • Autumn 2017, M. Todd Henderson and Justin Richland

Housing Initiative Transactional Clinic

The Housing Initiative Transactional Clinic provides legal representation on complex real estate development projects to build affordable housing.  Clients include nonprofit, community-based affordable housing developers and housing cooperatives.  Students serve as deal lawyers, working with clients and teams of professionals -- such as financial consultants, architects, marketing professionals, property managers, and social service providers -- to bring affordable housing and mixed use development projects to fruition.  Projects range from single family rehabs with budgets in the $30,000 to $75,000 range, to multi-million dollar rental and mixed use projects financed by low income housing tax credits, tax exempt bonds, TIF, and other layered subsidies.  Students also counsel nonprofit clients on governance and tax issues related to their work.  In addition to their client work, students meet as a group in a weekly two-hour seminar in autumn quarter, and in a weekly one-hour seminar during winter and spring quarters, to discuss the substantive rules and legal skills pertinent to real estate development transactions and to examine emergent issues arising out of the students' work. During the fall quarter seminar, returning clinic students need only attend the first hour; new students should attend for the full two hours. In the winter and spring quarters, all students should attend all the one-hour seminar sessions. Academic credit for the Housing Initiative Transactional Clinic varies and is awarded according to the Law School's general criteria for clinical courses as described in the Law School Announcements and by the approval of the clinical faculty. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Jeffrey E. Leslie
  • Winter 2021, Jeffrey E. Leslie
  • Autumn 2020, Jeffrey E. Leslie
  • Spring 2020, Jeffrey E. Leslie
  • Winter 2020, Jeffrey E. Leslie
  • Autumn 2019, Jeffrey E. Leslie
  • Spring 2019, Jeffrey E. Leslie
  • Winter 2019, Jeffrey E. Leslie
  • Autumn 2018, Jeffrey E. Leslie

Immigrants' Rights Clinic

The Immigrants' Rights Clinic provides legal representation to immigrant communities in Chicago, including individual representation of immigrants in removal proceedings, immigration-related complex federal litigation, and policy and community education projects on behalf of community-based organizations. Students will interview clients, develop claims and defenses, draft complaints, engage in motion practice and settlement discussions, appear in federal, state, and administrative courts, brief and argue appeals, and engage in media advocacy. In the policy and community education projects, students may develop and conduct community presentations, draft and advocate for legislation at the state and local levels, and provide support to immigrants' rights organizations. The seminar will meet for two hours per week and will include classes on the fundamentals of immigration law and policy as well as skills-based classes that connect to the students' fieldwork. Both 2L and 3L students are encouraged to apply. Students must enroll for either 2 or 3 credits each quarter and must enroll for all three quarters.  Instructor note: while many clinic activities can be conducted remotely, there may be some fieldwork activities, such as client interviews and court hearings, that must be conducted in-person. Students who will not be geographically located in Chicago for some or all of the year should speak with Professor Hallett before bidding. Students with questions may contact Professor Hallett at nhallett@uchicago.edu to learn more. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Students will be evaluated on the fieldwork portion of course on the basis of whether they:

  • Fulfill professional obligations to clients
  • Work diligently and zealously towards accomplishing the clients' goals
  • Collaborate with team members and supervisor effectively
  • Show willingness to learn new skills and confront new legal problems
  • Show improvement in legal writing, oral advocacy, and other lawyering skills
  • Willingly incorporate feedback into your work
  • Use reflection to learn from clinic experiences
  • Display responsibility, collegiality, and professionalism
  • Meet internal and external deadlines
  • Attend class prepared to discuss readings and regularly participate in classroom discussions
  • Practice excellent file management and time-keeping

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Amber Nicole Hallett
  • Winter 2021, Amber Nicole Hallett
  • Autumn 2020, Amber Nicole Hallett
  • Spring 2020, Amber Nicole Hallett
  • Winter 2020, Amber Nicole Hallett

Innovation Clinic

The Innovation Clinic gives students the opportunity to counsel startups and venture capital funds on a broad range of corporate law and strategic issues, including regulatory compliance, entity formation, stock options and employee equity, privacy, employment, governance and founders' agreements, and commercial agreements.  Students also present on such topics at the Argonne National Laboratories' Chain Reaction Innovations Incubator and at the Polsky Center. In addition to their work with the Clinic's clients and the substantive topic areas to be covered, students will have the opportunity to train in, and develop, the soft skills that separate good lawyers from highly effective lawyers in a transactional practice, such as negotiation, client management, preparedness and flexibility. Students will work with startups across a wide variety of industries and will also complete non-client related homework assignments to prepare them for client work. Students are required to enroll in the Clinic for a minimum of two consecutive quarters, and enrollment is currently capped at three consecutive quarters of participation. Students may take between 1-3 credits in any given quarter.

Students will be evaluated based on the quality of work they prepare for the Clinic's clients, how well they interact with clients and demonstrate a command of the soft skills required for effective transactional legal practice, and the volume and quality of their participation during in-class sessions.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Emily Underwood
  • Winter 2021, Emily Underwood
  • Autumn 2020, Emily Underwood
  • Spring 2020, Emily Underwood
  • Winter 2020, Emily Underwood
  • Autumn 2019, Emily Underwood
  • Winter 2019, Emily Underwood
  • Autumn 2018, Emily Underwood
  • Spring 2018, Salen Churi
  • Winter 2018, Salen Churi
  • Autumn 2017, Salen Churi

Innovation Fund Associates Program Practicum

The Innovation Fund Associates ("IFA") program practicum is an avenue for law students who are accepted into the IFA program to receive course credit for their participation in lieu of the available stipend. Information regarding the IFA program can be found here: https://polsky.uchicago.edu/programs-events/innovation-fund-associates-….

Students receive 3 credits during each of the Spring and Autumn Quarters, and prepare brief response papers during each of those quarters reflecting on their experience. There is substantial training during the Winter Quarter but no credit is offered for this time. During the Spring and Autumn Quarters, in addition to the final presentation date and celebratory dinner that follows, students should plan on meeting (1) for two to three hours every other Friday at noon for status updates, (2) on three to four additional dates that will be communicated to accepted students during the preceding quarter for trainings on topics such as patent law, FDA regulatory processes and compliance, public speaking, and other subjects relevant to the funding candidates during that cycle, and (3) two to three times per week with their teams, fund leaders, funding candidates and industry experts as part of the diligence process. There is substantial individual work outside of these meetings. Students do all coursework at the Polsky Center with potential site visits to the offices of industry experts and target companies. The approximate time commitment for the program is an average of 15 hours per week, although that may vary. Students may either take the offered stipend or course credit in any given quarter, but not both, and must be accepted into the IFA program through its normal application procedures before they are eligible to participate in the practicum.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Emily Underwood
  • Autumn 2020, Emily Underwood
  • Spring 2020, Emily Underwood

Institute for Justice Clinic on Entrepreneurship

The Institute for Justice Clinic on Entrepreneurship, or IJ Clinic, provides legal assistance to low-income entrepreneurs who are pursuing the American Dream in spite of legal obstacles. IJ Clinic students develop practical skills in transactional lawyering while helping creative entrepreneurs earn an honest living, innovate, and build businesses that build neighborhoods. Students advise clients on issues such as business formation, licensing, zoning, strategic relationships, employment law, intellectual property protection, and regulatory compliance. Students become trusted advisors for their clients and have the opportunity to consult with clients on business developments; draft and review custom contracts; negotiate deals; research complex regulatory schemes and advise clients on how to comply; and occasionally appear before administrative bodies. Students may also work on policy projects to change laws that restrict low-income entrepreneurs. Policy work may involve legislative drafting, lobbying, and community organizing. Academic credit varies and will be awarded according to the Law School's general criteria for clinical courses as described in the Law School Announcements and by the approval of the clinical staff. A commitment of at least two consecutive quarters is required.

Evaluation is based holistically on the student's client work.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Elizabeth Kregor
  • Winter 2021, Elizabeth Kregor
  • Autumn 2020, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Spring 2020, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Winter 2020, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Autumn 2019, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Spring 2019, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Winter 2019, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Autumn 2018, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Spring 2018, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Winter 2018, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik
  • Autumn 2017, Elizabeth Kregor and Amy Hermalik

Intensive Contract Drafting Workshop

This 3-credit intensive seminar will meet each weekday morning from 9:00am-11:15am from August 24 - September 4. There will be an additional optional Zoom library session on September 2 from 11:30am-12:30pm. Classes will be conducted remotely via Zoom. All times are listed in Central time and students should take any time differences in their physical location into account when deciding whether to register for the seminar. Students should plan to spend a substantial part of each afternoon doing written homework which is due each evening, and a part of each evening doing reading and preparation for the next day's class. The seminar will serve as an introduction to contract drafting and how such drafting differs from other types of legal writing. We will start with the basic "anatomy of a contract," discussing the meaning, use and effect of various provisions. The seminar will address not only legal drafting issues, but also how to understand a client's practical business needs in order to effectively use the contract as a planning and problem solving tool. Students will draft specific contract provisions and a complete contract, and will learn how to read, review and analyze contracts with an eye toward both legal and business risk issues. Many/most of the exercises simulate working with a fictional client. Grades will be based upon class participation and a series of substantial out-of-class daily drafting exercises. Students are not eligible to register if they have taken Contract Drafting and Review, Advanced Contract Skills or other similar contract drafting courses.

For more information regarding the Intensive Contract Drafting Workshop, please email Professor Underwood at underwood@uchicago.edu.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Emily Ann Underwood
  • Autumn 2019, Joan E. Neal and Emily Ann Underwood

Intensive Negotiation Seminar

Negotiation skills are crucially important for lawyers in private and public practice. Just think of business deals, divorce settlements, plea bargaining or the current Brexit negotiations between the United Kingdom and the European Union.

The aim of this seminar is to develop students' negotiation skills and to introduce them to cutting-edge game theoretic and psychological research on negotiation theory and management. The seminar capitalizes on the instructor's own research and experience as negotiator, mediator and arbitrator in national and international commercial conflicts. It is based on a proprietary conceptual approach to negotiation management, which has been used to train partners and associates of top-tier law firms, management consultants, business executives and policy-makers.

This two-day seminar will cover problems of intuitive negotiations, negotiation analysis-especially the 'four key negotiation factors'-, negotiation dynamics and process management, including communication theory and skills, aggressive tactics and negotiation strategy. It will be taught by a combination of short interactive lectures and role-plays and other practical exercises. The seminar will be most useful to students who have already participated in some basic negotiation training. Students will receive a bundle with key reading material in advance of the seminar. This seminar is a two day short class meeting on Friday, Nov. 8 from 9am-6pm, and Saturday, Nov. 9 from 9am-4pm.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2019, Horst Eidenmuller (as Advanced Negotiation Seminar)
  • Spring 2019, Ian Solomon
  • Autumn 2018, Ian Solomon

Intensive Trial Practice Workshop

This is a required class for participation in the Civil Rights-Police Accountability Clinic, the Criminal & Juvenile Justice Project Clinic, and the Exoneration Project Clinic. This class is strongly recommended for participation in the Employment Law Clinic and the Federal Criminal Justice Clinic. It is also open to all rising 3Ls, irrespective of participation in any clinic. This class teaches trial preparation, trial advocacy, and strategy through a variety of teaching techniques, including lectures and demonstrations, but primarily through simulated trial exercises. Topics include opening statements, witness preparation, direct and cross examination, expert witnesses, objections at trial, and closing argument. Practicing lawyers and judges are enlisted to provide students with demonstrations and critiques from varied perspectives. The class concludes with a simulated jury trial presided over by sitting state and federal court judges. Open to 3L J.D. students only. The faculty strongly recommend that students take Evidence prior to enrolling in this course. Completion of this class partially satisfies one of the requirements for admission to the trial bar of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Students who have taken Trial Advocacy (LAWS 67603) or Trial Practice: Strategy and Advocacy (LAWS 91702) may not take this class.

This class is offered for approximately 5-6 hours/day before the beginning of the Autumn Quarter. The Autumn 2019 Workshop is scheduled from 9/16 through 9/27, and the final trial is scheduled for Saturday, September 28.  The student's grade is based on a compilation of daily performance evaluations. For more information regarding Intensive Trial Practice Workshop, please email Professor Futterman at futterman@uchicago.edu, or Professor Conyers at hconyers@uchicago.edu

Previously:

  • Autumn 2019, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers, Craig Futterman, and Erica K. Zunkel
  • Autumn 2018, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers, Craig Futterman, Erica K. Zunkel, and Jorge Alonso
  • Autumn 2017, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers, Randolph Stone, and Craig Futterman

International Arbitration

This seminar provides a basic foundation in the law and mechanics of international commercial arbitration and international investment treaty arbitration. It will give students an understanding of the substantive and strategic issues that frequently confront international arbitration practitioners. The Seminar covers, among other things, the crafting of international arbitration agreements, the relative advantages and disadvantages of ad hoc UNCITRAL-Rules arbitration and institutional arbitration (e.g., ICC, LCIA, ICDR, ICSID). The seminar also addresses the rules of procedure that commonly govern international arbitration, including procedural issues that commonly arise in international arbitration, including the availability and extent of discovery, pre-hearing procedure, the presentation of evidence, and the enforcement of international arbitral awards. The Seminar also will cover the fundamentals of international investment arbitration, including the jurisdictional issues that commonly arise in investor-state arbitration and the types of treaty claims that are commonly asserted under international law. While there will be a fair amount of traditional lecture, the format of the Seminar will depend heavily upon active student participation, including a mock arbitration exercise. Students will be graded based upon the quality of their preparation for and participation in the Seminar, as well as the quality of a required paper (20-25 pages). This Seminar will satisfy part of the lesser of the school's two writing requirements, if substantial research and written work is completed.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Javier Rubenstein
  • Autumn 2019, Javier Rubenstein
  • Autumn 2018, Javier Rubinstein
  • Autumn 2017, Javier Rubinstein

Jenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic

The Jenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic represents parties and amici curiae in cases before the United States Supreme Court and other appellate courts. Students work on all aspects of the clinic's cases -- from formulating case strategy; to researching and writing merits briefs, amicus curiae briefs, and petitions for certiorari; to preparing for oral arguments. Students also conduct research on cases that may be suitable to bring to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although the clinic's focus is the U.S. Supreme Court, the clinic may also handle cases in the United States Courts of Appeals and the Illinois Supreme Court.

The clinic is supervised by Associate Clinical Professor Sarah Konsky, Professor David Strauss, and members of the Appellate and Supreme Court Practice group at Jenner & Block. U.S. Supreme Court: Theory and Practice (LAWS 50311) is required as either a pre-requisite or co-requisite for 2L and 3L students participating in the clinic. Students who have successfully completed a course covering content comparable to the U.S. Supreme Court: Theory and Practice seminar may seek consent from Professor Konsky to waive the co-requisite requirement. Academic credit for the clinic varies and is awarded according to the Law School's general criteria for clinical courses as described in the Law School Announcements and by the approval of the clinical faculty. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Winter 2021, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Autumn 2020, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Spring 2020, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Winter 2020, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Autumn 2019, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Winter 2019, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Autumn 2018, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Spring 2018, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Winter 2018, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky
  • Autumn 2017, David A. Strauss and Sarah M. Konsky

Judicial Opinion Writing

Judicial opinions are the means by which judges explain their rulings to the litigants and their lawyers, and in many instances (depending largely, but not exclusively, on whether the judge is writing on behalf of a court of review) to the bar as a whole, other judges, other branches of government, and/or the public at large. For those of you planning to serve as a law clerk after graduation, opinion drafting and editing likely will comprise the lion's share of your work. For those of you planning on a career as a litigator, understanding the elements of judicial opinion writing will help you to effectively frame your arguments in your briefs and at oral argument. And for all of you, reinforcing the skills necessary to write clearly and edit wisely will serve you well whatever your future plans. The class will begin with a careful review of the work of some well known judges, past and contemporary. The remaining sessions will proceed largely in a workshop format. For the first half of the remaining sessions, each of you will rewrite a recent, published appellate opinion that we will select. For the second half, each of you will write an appellate opinion from scratch based on a real case that we will select and that will recently have been argued. If your opinion is up for discussion for a given week, we will ask that you post it to the class site by noon on the Monday preceding the class so that we and the other students can read it. More than one student will be assigned each rewritten and original opinion, enabling the class to compare different approaches taken to the same set of problems. The point of this, as you'll see, is entirely pedagogical; it is not to turn this class into the law school equivalent of Top Chef or Project Runway. There is no single right way to construct an eminently readable and learned opinion. A series of reaction papers is required for this class. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Robert Hochman and Gary Feinerman
  • Winter 2020, Robert Hochman and Gary Feinerman (as Judicial Opinions and Judicial Opinion Writing)
  • Winter 2019, Robert Hochman and Gary Feinerman (as Judicial Opinions and Judicial Opinion Writing)
  • Winter 2018, Richard A. Posner and Robert Hochman (as Judicial Opinions and Judicial Opinion Writing)

Kirkland & Ellis Corporate Lab Clinic

The Kirkland & Ellis Lab provides students with a forum for working closely with legal and business teams at top-tier multinational companies, leading nonprofits, and entrepreneurial startups. The primary goal of the Lab is for students to learn practical legal skills, both substantively, in terms of the corporate "building blocks" necessary to understand complex transactions and agreements, and professionally, in terms of implementing such knowledge efficiently and meaningfully within the context of a wide array of careers as lawyers and business leaders. This class mirrors the real world work experience of both litigators and corporate lawyers: students will receive hands-on substantive and client-development experience and will be expected to manage and meet expectations and deadlines while exercising a high level of professionalism. Clients will include Abercrombie & Fitch, Accenture, Baxter Healthcare, Booth School of Business New Venture Challenge (Spring Quarter), GE Healthcare, Honeywell, IBM, John Deere, Microsoft, Nike, Northern Trust, Schreiber Foods, and Verizon Communications.  Corporate Lab students also will have the opportunity, should they wish, to negotiate a simulated cross-border transaction opposite students of a leading foreign law school as part of the negotiation workshop component of the Corporate Lab (Autumn Quarter). Please note: (i) students are expected to remain in the Corporate Lab for a minimum of two consecutive quarters, (ii) students may not take the Corporate Lab for more than nine credits, and (iii) this offering will not count toward seminar restrictions. Student grades will be based upon participation in the classroom, appropriate attention to client services, collaborative efforts within a team environment, and quality of work product. For additional information, see the Corporate Lab website at http://www.law.uchicago.edu/corporatelab.  (Reduced 2-credit option available with instructor permission.)

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, David Jeffrey Zarfes, Joshua Evan Avratin, and Sean Zachary Kramer
  • Winter 2021, David Jeffrey Zarfes, Joshua Evan Avratin, and Sean Zachary Kramer
  • Autumn 2020, David Jeffrey Zarfes, Joshua Evan Avratin, and Sean Zachary Kramer
  • Spring 2020, David Jeffrey Zarfes, Sean Zachary Kramer, and Joshua Evan Avratin
  • Winter 2020, David Jeffrey Zarfes, Sean Zachary Kramer, and Joshua Evan Avratin
  • Autumn 2019, David Jeffrey Zarfes, Sean Zachary Kramer, and Joshua Evan Avratin

Law and Public Policy:  Case Studies in Problem Solving

This course examines the intersection of law and public policy and the lawyer's role in helping to formulate and defend public policy choices, using recent, real-world problems based on the instructor's experience as Corporation Counsel for the City of Chicago and senior legal advisor to Mayor Rahm Emanuel.  While the course will be conducted in a seminar/discussion format, a significant portion of each class will be devoted to hands-on role-playing in which students will play the role of legal advisors to an elected official, grappling with and proposing solutions to vexing issues of public policy.

While this course may be of particular interest to students who are interested in public service and public policy-making, its emphasis on developing students' analytical and problem-solving skills and on providing hands-on, practical experience in advising clients on complex issues should be of benefit to any student, regardless of interests and career objectives.  Providing legal analysis and advice and counseling clients on available options are a critical part of almost every legal career, whether as a litigator or transactional lawyer in a private firm or as in-house counsel for a corporation or not-for-profit.

Assigned reading will include press articles, proposed legislation, briefs and pleadings, and other materials concerning the case studies/public policy issues that will be examined.  Students will be expected to identify and analyze  legal issues and limits, competing legal and policy interests, and possible policy alternatives and advise their "client" accordingly.  Grades will be based on class participation and performance in role-playing exercises and short  (5 page) reaction papers concerning three of the case studies that will be examined.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Stephen R. Patton
  • Autumn 2019, Stephen R. Patton
  • Autumn 2018, Stephen R. Patton

Legal Elements of Accounting

This mini-class introduces accounting from a mixed law and business perspective. It covers basic concepts and vocabulary of accounting, not so much to instill proficiency with the mechanics of debits and credits as to serve as a foundation from which to understand financial statements. The course then examines accounting from a legal perspective, including consideration of common accounting decisions with potential legal ramifications. It also analyzes throughout the reasons for and roles of financial accounting and auditing, as well as the incentives of various persons involved in producing, regulating, and consuming financial accounting information. The seminar will touch on some limitations of, and divergent results possible under, generally accepted accounting principles. Current cases, proposals, and controversies will be discussed. Attendance and participation will be very important. Grades will be based on a final exam. Students with substantial prior exposure to accounting (such as students with an MBA, joint MBA/JD students, and undergraduate finance or accounting majors) may not take the course for credit. This is a 9 day short class that will meet 1/11-1/15 and 1/19-1/22.

Previously:

  • Winter 2018, John R. Sylla
  • Winter 2019, John R. Sylla
  • Winter 2020, John R. Sylla
  • Winter 2021, John R. Sylla

Legal Profession

This course, which satisfies the professional responsibility requirement, will consider the law and the ethics governing lawyers. Among the topics that will be examined are the nature of the lawyer-client relationship, competency, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and some fundamental questions about who we are and what we stand for as lawyers. A student's grade is based on a final examination. This class will be capped at 50.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Barry Alberts
  • Spring 2020, Barry Alberts
  • Spring 2019, Barry Alberts
  • Spring 2018, Barry Alberts

Legal Profession: Ethics

This seminar addresses ethical considerations and issues encountered during the practice of law, including strategic, practical, and moral considerations with which attorneys should be familiar. Using materials from casebooks, the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, cases or articles of particular interest, and videos, we will discuss within the context of the Model Rules the ethical situations that lawyers face. There will be a particular focus on the ambiguities of how to handle particularly difficult issues encountered in the practice of law and the rules and framework to which attorneys can turn in determining how to handle those situations. Throughout the seminar, we will consider certain overarching questions, including: a. are lawyers authorized by their duties to clients to lie, b. is civility consistent with the duty of vigorous representation, c. are aspects of the practice of law beyond the rules, and d. can there be a conflict without direct adversity. This seminar will be taught as a participatory class and will use structured hypotheticals, role playing, class discussions, and class competitions. A short quarter ending presentation is required.  Students will be evaluated both on the quality and extent of their participation and the presentation and on the basis of a paper of 20 pages in length on a topic relating to professional responsibility chosen by and of particular interest to the student. Attendance is mandatory. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Hal Morris
  • Winter 2020, Hal Morris
  • Winter 2019, Hal Morris
  • Winter 2018, Hal Morris

Legal Spanish: Public Interest Law in the US

This course brings students to high-intermediate levels in reading, speaking, and listening for the practice of public interest law in the US. Learners will build proficiency around relevant topic areas so that they can read, listen, explain, present and solicit information related to rights, procedures, legal actions, etc.  Pre-requisite: one year of university-level Spanish or equivalent.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Darcy Whilldin Lear

Litigation Laboratory

This seminar brings lawyers and students together to analyze and develop aspects of the lawyers' ongoing cases. It allows good lawyers to use law students for collaborative help with open cases, and allows law students to learn litigation skills by working with the lawyers. A different lawyer with a different case will participate in most class sessions. Typically the lawyer will provide materials for the students to review before the class. During the class, students will discuss, argue, debate, and work with the lawyer to solve hard issues. Following each class, students will complete written materials analyzing and evaluating the problem. In classes when lawyers are not included, students also learn practical litigation skills through various advocacy exercises. Students will be graded based on active participation and their written materials. The class requires substantial out-of-class work, often individual but sometimes collaborative.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Catherine M. Masters and James A. Clark
  • Winter 2020, Catherine M. Masters and James A. Clark
  • Winter 2019, Catherine M. Masters and James A. Clark
  • Winter 2018, Catherine M. Masters and James A. Clark

Modern Professional Responsibility

This course satisfies the professional responsibility requirement. It will explore a variety of legal, ethical and real-world issues commonly faced by modern lawyers in their daily practices. It will address the relationship among the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, the Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It will also focus on several noteworthy legal malpractice and securities claims in which lawyers and major law firms were involved. Course materials will include traditional texts and statutory materials, hypotheticals drawn from unreported matters, as well as the results of mock trials and jury focus groups in which the conduct of lawyers was at issue. This class has a final take-home examination. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Mark Nozette
  • Autumn 2019, Mark Nozette
  • Autumn 2018, Mark Nozette
  • Autumn 2017, Mark Nozette

Moot Court Boot Camp

Moot Court Boot Camp has two components: oral advocacy and writing. The oral advocacy component will cover the basics of appellate oral argument. Students will receive briefs and/or bullet points from two different cases and will prepare and submit argument outlines in advance. During the workshop, students will gain hands-on experience by conducting multiple oral arguments before practicing-attorney judges, who will provide feedback. The writing component will cover the basics of appellate brief writing. Students will prepare a short, written assignment that we will discuss and revise during class. We will focus on strong issue statements, effective headings, and powerful conclusions. We'll also explore sentence structure and word choice. Students will learn to define themes in their writing and carry them into the oral argument. Focused writing promotes successful oral advocacy, and vice versa. This class, which will meet for one weekend (October 10-11) during the quarter, is an optional supplement to the Hinton Moot Court Competition. One credit will be granted for the weekend course and an additional credit will be granted upon completion of two judged arguments as part of the Hinton Moot Court Competition. There are no prerequisites, but good faith participation in the Hinton Moot Court Competition is required. Students may receive credit for this class only once during their Law School career. The Moot Court Boot Camp is open to J.D. students only and is graded Pass/Fail.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Madeline Ward Lansky and Rebecca Margaret Taylor Horwitz
  • Autumn 2019, Sharon Renee Fairley
  • Autumn 2018, Sarah Konsky and James Whitehead
  • Autumn 2017, Elizabeth Duquette and Lisa M. Noller

Negotiation

This class will introduce the theory and practice of negotiation across various contexts, including deal-making and dispute resolution. It will give students an organized theoretical framework for analyzing various parties' positions and crafting thoughtful strategies. Students will develop their practical skills and individual styles through a series of simulation exercises, which will be executed inside and outside of class and then discussed and critiqued. Exposure to different techniques, styles, and contexts will be used to teach students what works best for them. Grading will be based on a series of reaction papers and out of classroom work. Participation may be considered in final grading. You may not take this class if you have taken LAWS 81003 Intensive Negotiation Seminar.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Jesse Ruiz
  • Spring 2020, Jesse Ruiz
  • Spring 2019, Jesse Ruiz
  • Spring 2018, Jeffrey Leslie and Jesse Ruiz

Partnership Taxation

A review of the principles of partnership taxation, with an emphasis on the tax consequences of the formation, operation and dissolution of partnerships. Matters discussed include the treatment of leverage, capital accounts, disguised sales, mixing bowls, anti-abuse rules and other aspects of partnership taxation. This class has a final exam. Participation may be considered in final grading. Prerequisite: Introductory Income Tax.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Richard M. Lipton and Maher Haddad
  • Spring 2020, Richard M. Lipton and Maher Haddad
  • Spring 2019, Richard M. Lipton

Poverty and Housing Law Clinic

This clinic, conducted over two sequential quarters, exposes students to the practice of poverty law by giving them the opportunity to work on housing cases at Legal Aid Chicago, the Midwest's largest provider of free civil legal services to people who are living in poverty or otherwise vulnerable. Students may be be asked to attend administrative grievance hearings, represent tenants facing unwarranted evictions, and prevent landlords from performing lockouts or refusing to make necessary repairs. All students will be expected to interview clients, prepare written discovery, conduct research, and draft motions. In addition to working 12 hours a week at LAF, students will attend a weekly two-hour class to learn about subsidized housing programs, eviction actions, housing discrimination, representing tenants with disabilities, the intersection between domestic violence and housing, and the extensive and often misunderstood connection between criminal law and housing. A 10 page paper is required. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Lawrence Wood
  • Winter 2021, Lawrence Wood
  • Spring 2020, Lawrence Wood
  • Winter 2020, Lawrence Wood
  • Spring 2019, Lawrence Wood
  • Winter 2019, Lawrence Wood

Presence: Performance Skills for Lawyers

This seminar examines the performance, improvisation, storytelling, and engagement skills necessary to help you excel as an attorney and beyond.  Through a series of interactive group exercises and games, performance theory discussions, and individual assignments, we will explore how to tap into your unique, authentic voice to positively engage others and better represent your clients.  By the end of this course, you should be able to speak and move with more freedom and presence, listen fully and authentically, and joyfully connect with audiences of all sizes and backgrounds.  No prior performance or public speaking experience necessary; just bring your full attention, sense of curiosity and play, and willingness to express yourself to each class. This is a performance skills course, so in-class participation, discussion, and presentations will be the basis for evaluation.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Paul S. Marchegiani

Pretrial Litigation:  Strategy and Advocacy

This seminar will focus on litigation skills and strategies that are instrumental in the day-to-day life of any litigator. Indeed, a lawyer will use many of the same strategies and skills in both the pretrial and trial phases of litigation. Students will learn how to evaluate and develop fact and legal theories; develop themes; take and defend depositions; draft pretrial motions; and use various tactics to prepare a case for trial. The seminar will use a variety of learning methodologies, including lectures and mock exercises.  The student's grade will based on class participation, including participation in mock exercises, and written work product (series of research papers (20-25 pages).

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Barry E. Fields
  • Winter 2020, Barry E. Fields
  • Winter 2019, Barry E. Fields

Private Equity Transactions: Issues and Documentation

This seminar will examine from a practical perspective the issues and documentation arising in a typical private equity acquisition transaction. The seminar will follow this type of transaction through its various stages and provide students in-depth and practical experience with common deal issues and drafting contractual provisions to address those issues. The goal of the seminar is to help prepare students for the practical aspects of being a deal lawyer. Coursework will include reading acquisition contracts, cases and legal commentators and weekly written assignments (contract drafting and issue analysis). Grades will be based on class participation and a series of reaction papers. Business Organizations and Contracts are prerequisites.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Mark A. Fennell and Stephen L. Ritchie
  • Winter 2020, Mark A. Fennell and Stephen L. Ritchie
  • Winter 2019, Mark A. Fennell and Stephen L. Ritchie
  • Winter 2018, Mark A. Fennell and Stephen L. Ritchie

Professional Responsibility and the Legal Profession

This course provides a systematic treatment of the law of professional responsibility. The central goal is to understand how the rules of professional conduct guide lawyer conduct and shape the legal profession. Toward that end, we will begin by examining the lawyer's key duties to clients in different contexts, paying attention to differences based on what lawyers do (advocacy, advising, negotiating), where they work (law firms, corporate legal departments, government legal offices, public interest organizations, legal services groups), and what types of clients they represent (individuals, classes, organizations). Drawing upon case materials and problems, our emphasis will be on how lawyers define and resolve ethical problems while promoting their public duties in the real world of practice. We will pay special attention to the two foundational rules of professional responsibility (client confidentiality and conflicts of interests) and will consider how market changes and demographic shifts impact the lawyer's role. Overall, the course is designed to help you think critically about the challenges you will face in the profession you are about to enter and how you can best meet them in the pursuit of your professional goals. This class has a final take-home exam. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Anna-Maria Marshall
  • Autumn 2019, Anna-Maria Marshall
  • Autumn 2018, Anna-Maria Marshall
  • Autumn 2017, Anna-Maria Marshall

Professional Responsibility: Representing Business Organizations

This seminar concerns the rules governing the legal profession and practical applications of the rules, with a focus on representing business organizations. Materials will include the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and a casebook; we may also read supplemental materials from time to time. Grades will be based on an final exam, several short response papers, and a class participation component. This seminar will fulfill the professional responsibility requirement.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Daniel Feeney, John C. Koski, and Brant Weidner
  • Winter 2020, Daniel Feeney, John C. Koski, and Brant Weidner
  • Winter 2019, Daniel Feeney

Prosecution and Defense Clinic

The Prosecution and Defense Clinic provides students with an opportunity to learn about the criminal justice system through: (1) a 2-quarter seminar taught by a former Assistant United States Attorney and a career defense lawyer; and, (2) a clinical placement in either a prosecutor's office or public defender's office.  The course will familiarize students with the legal procedures and issues which arise in a typical criminal case as well as ethical and other social justice issues encountered by all criminal justice attorneys and courts.  The clinic provides students with a unique combination of substantive criminal law and procedure, ethics, trial practice, and hands-on experience through a clinical placement.Each student in the clinic will be responsible for securing a field placement and participating in a pre-screened externship program with a federal or state prosecutor or defender office for the winter and spring quarters.  Examples include the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois or the Public Defender's office in any northern Illinois county.  Students will comply with the clinical placement's requirements regarding hours and assignments, and may be expected to research substantive criminal law issues, draft affirmative and responsive pleadings and memos, interview witnesses and clients, assist lawyers with court hearings and where permitted (and with an appropriate 711 license), appear in court under the supervision of practicing attorneys.Other components of each student's grade are: seminar classroom participation; trial practice exercises; journal entries; and, a 10-page practice paper or research paper.  There is no final exam (in either quarter) and students will earn up to seven credits for the course, depending on the placement.  Because of the practical component, the class size will be limited to twelve 2L or 3L students.

Previously:

  • Spring 2020, Lisa Marie Noller and Molly Armour
  • Winter 2020, Lisa Marie Noller and Molly Armour
  • Spring 2018, Lisa Marie Noller and Molly Armour
  • Winter 2018, Lisa Marie Noller and Molly Armour

Restructuring in Bankruptcy: Strategy and Tactics

This experiential seminar focuses on strategy and tactics in restructuring financially stressed and distressed companies. We will use a case study to illustrate the dynamics of advising boards of directors regarding fiduciary duties, stakeholder negotiations, and complex legal issues facing troubled companies.  The seminar alternates between a interactive learning session and an experiential session where students prepare and present to a mock board of directors or management of a financially distressed company.  Grades will be based 75% on the in-class presentations, 10% on class participation, and 15% on a 10-15 page client memorandum.

Prerequisite: Bankruptcy (recommended but not required)

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Chad J. Husnick
  • Winter 2019, Chad J. Husnick

The Role and Practice of the State Attorney General

All 50 States and the District of Columbia have an Attorney General, each of whom enjoys broad discretion over a range of legal issues. This seminar will address the institutional role of these officials, including their status within their respective state systems and their relationship to the federal government. The course will also address a host of critical and often controversial areas-including civil rights, criminal justice, consumer fraud, and environmental regulation-where state Attorneys General have come to play a leading role on the local and national stage. Students will be graded based on class participation and a final paper (20-25 pages).

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Michael Scodro and Lisa Madigan
  • Spring 2020, Michael Scodro and Lisa Madigan

Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advocacy Project

With faculty supervision, six to eight students will prepare and present a set of investor advocacy proposals to The Investor Advocate and other SEC Staff covering two to four topics. The proposals will include a written report with supporting data and arguments. The project will culminate in a one-hour presentation by students and faculty to The Investor Advocate and SEC Staff. The presentation is tentatively scheduled for May 26 and all work must be completed by that time. It is recommended that students who enroll in this course have taken or are taking Securities Regulation.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Anthony Joseph Casey, M. Todd Henderson, and Joshua C. Macey

Strategic Considerations in Securities and Corporate Governance Litigation

This seminar will introduce students to the most important strategic considerations that lawyers encounter in today's highly sophisticated financial services litigation. The litigators (and corporate lawyers) who concentrate in this area must function in an environment where the stakes are high, leverage is critical, and "victory" is defined by the client, not the court. Accordingly, this seminar examines the critical questions faced in virtually every financial services litigation matter including: (1) which is the most favorable venue for this litigation, including consideration of how legal principles vary jurisdiction by jurisdiction; (2) how does Directors and Officers Liability insurance impact the litigation, itself; (3) strategic considerations relating to the composition of the board and use of special litigation committees; (4) how dispositive motions can be used to, at a minimum, best frame and limit the litigation; (5) how derivative and class certification mechanisms can be used to narrow or defeat claims; (6) how to use the timing and positioning of mediation to produce a favorable result for the client; (7) who of your pool of potential experts should be identified, on what topics, and when to maximize chances of success; and (8) what is jury research and what role does it play in making thematic and settlement decisions. To further the student experience, we will supplement our sessions by bringing some of the nation's top practitioners in fields like jury research, D&O insurance, mediation and/or damage analysis to share their years of expertise drawn from real world situations. A series of reaction papers will be required. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Steven B. Feirson and Joni S. Jacobsen
  • Spring 2020, Steven B. Feirson and Joni S. Jacobsen
  • Spring 2019, Steven B. Feirson and Joni S. Jacobsen
  • Spring 2018, Steven B. Feirson and Joni S. Jacobsen

Strategies and Processes of Negotiations

Increasingly negotiation is part of the day-to-day life of managers. The aim of this class is to make students more effective negotiators. Students should leave the class with (1) a structured approach for preparing for and thinking about negotiations; and (2) a refined set of skills for carrying out negotiations. A central part of the class is an extensive set of negotiation simulations. These simulations take students through a variety of negotiations: single and multiple issue; two-negotiator and multiple-negotiator (coalitional); and internal (within organization) and external. In addition, the class includes a number of cases. Lectures, readings, and structured analytical exercises supplement the simulations and cases. Grading is based on the  following: class participation; 3 reflection reports; problem sets; prep notes; final paper

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, George Wu
  • Winter 2020, George Wu
  • Winter 2019, George Wu
  • Winter 2018, George Wu

Structuring Venture Capital, Private Equity, and Entrepreneurial Transactions

Course covers tax, legal, & economic principles applicable to series of interesting, complex, current entrepreneurial transactions, utilizing venture capital (VC) or private equity (PE) financing, including (1) new business start-up, (2) growth-equity investment in existing business enterprise, (3) leveraged buyout of private or public company (including going-private transaction), (4) use of both double-tax C corp and flow-through single-tax S corp, partnership, or LLC for variety of VC or PE financed transactions, (5) devising equity-based exec comp program, (6) PE financed restructuring or workout (in or out of bankruptcy) for troubled over-leveraged enterprise and utilizing troubled corp's NOL post-restructuring, (7) exit scenarios for successful VC or PE financed enterprise (such as IPO, series of SEC rule 144 stock sales, sale of company, or merger of company into larger enterprise), & (8) forming VC, PE, or LBO fund.

Substantive subjects include federal income tax, federal securities regulation, state corp, partnership, & LLC law, federal bankruptcy law, fraudulent conveyance law, & other legal doctrines, as well as accounting rules (for exec comp and acquisition accounting) & practical structuring issues (including use of common & preferred stock, subordinated or mezzanine debt, convertible debt & preferred stock, warrants, options, & substantial-risk-of-forfeiture stock), all reviewed in transactional context, with discussion of policy underpinnings & likely future evolution.

No specific prerequisites, but introductory income tax strongly recommended, entity taxation desirable, & knowledge of corp law, securities regulation, bankruptcy, & accounting helpful. However, course book & course book appendix contain sufficient discussion & supplemental material so student can (with careful reading) adequately comprehend these topics. Grade based on final take-home examination. Instructor consent not required.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Stephen Laurence Ritchie and Mike Carew
  • Spring 2020, Jack Levin and Donald Rocap
  • Spring 2019, Jack Levin and Donald Rocap
  • Spring 2018, Jack Levin and Donald Rocap

Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenant Litigation

In this seminar, students will learn how to litigate and try trade secrets and restrictive covenants cases.  Two active practitioners in the field will teach this seminar based on actual recent cases.  Each class will include instruction on the substance of the law in the field and actual practice techniques, including on-your-feet argument in each class.  Specifically, all students will have the opportunity to argue various aspects of trade secrets and restrictive covenants cases, ranging from motions to dismiss, TRO/preliminary injunction motions, motions to compel, summary judgment motions, and post-judgment appeals. This class also requires a series of reaction papers. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Winter 2021, Brian D. Sieve and Michael B. Slade
  • Winter 2019, Brian D. Sieve and Michael B. Slade

Transactional Skills

This seminar is intended for students who want to become transactional lawyers.  We will explore the broad role of a transactional lawyer and cover a series of discrete topics to hone more advanced skills to help clients achieve their transactional goals. Issues covered may include: close reading, issue spotting  and problem solving in more complex types of agreements; effective negotiation; use of master agreements; use of term sheets/letters of intent; pros and cons of contract simplification; drafting of more complex provisions and relevant business implementation considerations; and analysis of more complex risk allocation provisions. Some classes will include guest speakers from practice (both law firm and in-house counsel). Contract Drafting and Review is a prerequisite for this seminar. Grades will be based upon class participation, a series of weekly written homework assignments and in-class exercises, and a final reaction paper.

Previously:

  • Spring 2020, Joan E. Neal

Trial Advocacy

This course teaches students the basics of trial advocacy, including formulating a theory of the case, delivering opening and closing statements, conducting direct and cross examinations, introducing exhibits, making and responding to evidentiary objections, navigating technology in the courtroom, and handling experts. The faculty consists of clinical faculty, sitting judges, and trial lawyers from the community who have extensive litigation experience. Students will learn by doing. Each week, faculty will give mini-lectures and then students will perform trial exercises in small groups with faculty supervisors. Each student's performance will be critiqued by a faculty member.

This course is open to 3L students only. The required pre-requisites/co-requisites are Evidence AND first priority is given to students enrolled in the Abrams Environmental Law Clinic, the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Project, the Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project, the Employment Law Clinic, and the Federal Criminal Justice Clinic. Participation may be considered in final grading.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Erica Kristine Zunkel, Jorge Alonso, Craig Futterman, Herschella Juanita Glenn Conyers, and Judith P. Miller
  • Spring 2019, Jay Cohen
  • Spring 2018, Jay Cohen

U.S. Supreme Court: Theory and Practice

This seminar will provide an in-depth look at the U.S. Supreme Court, with particular emphasis on the skills required to practice successfully in that forum. Students will not only discuss the Court as an institution, but they will also hone skills needed to navigate the certiorari process and to brief and argue before the Court. In addition to class participation, students will be graded on a legal brief (generally 15-20 pages in length) and a short reaction paper.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2020, Sarah M. Konsky and Michael Scodro
  • Autumn 2019, Sarah M. Konsky and Michael Scodro
  • Autumn 2018, Sarah M. Konsky and Michael Scodro
  • Autumn 2017, Sarah M. Konsky and Michael Scodro

USCAAF Student Practitioner

For this project six students will prepare and argue an appellate brief in a real case before the Court of Appeals for the Armed Services. Pursuant to the court's rules, three students will be assigned to argue on behalf of the appellant and three students will be assigned to argue on behalf of the appellee. Under the supervision of Faculty members who will seek to appear Pro Hac Vice in the case, the students will draft a brief that will be filed with the court. One of the three students on each side will be selected to argue the case before the court during a visit to the law school.

Previously:

  • Spring 2020, Richard McAdams, Erica Kristine Zunkel, Sharon Renee Fairley, Judith P. Miller
  • Winter 2020, Sharon Renee Fairley, Richard McAdams, Judith P Miller, Erica Kristine Zunkel

Workshop: Legal Scholarship

This workshop is designed for students (including JSDs and LLMs) who are considering an academic career as well as those who want to improve their public speaking and written expression skills. It may be taken for a full year as a course (every other week in W and S) or only in the fall quarter as a seminar. In the fall young scholars from around the world present works in progress and students write reaction papers and question them as the faculty does in other workshops. As we discuss what does and does not work in these papers and presentations, students will get a clear sense of the types of topics that lead to good papers by young scholars, how good scholarship is structured, and how to give an engaging and clear presentation. In the Winter and Spring students write an original piece of legal scholarship or revise a previously written  paper for publication. The goal of the workshop is to create a learning community that will provide students with the type of scholarly atmosphere the faculty here enjoys, something all the more important in the age of Zoom. Students enrolled for the year will be expected to conduct themselves as they would if they were junior faculty members at a top law school, reading and commenting on the work of their peers. Optional lunches to discuss writing will be held throughout the year in the same format as the Faculty Round Table.

The FALL ONLY version is graded on the basis of short reactions papers and class participation, the full year version grade depends on the written paper and its presentation as well. The full year version may fulfill the WP or the SRP.

Previously:

  • Spring 2021, Lisa Bernstein
  • Winter 2021, Lisa Bernstein
  • Autumn 2020, Lisa Bernstein
  • Spring 2020, Lisa Bernstein
  • Winter 2020, Lisa Bernstein
  • Autumn 2019, Lisa Bernstein
  • Spring 2019, Lisa Bernstein
  • Winter 2019, Lisa Bernstein
  • Autumn 2018, Lisa Bernstein
  • Spring 2018, Lisa Bernstein
  • Winter 2018, Lisa Bernstein
  • Autumn 2017, Lisa Bernstein

World Bank Practicum

This practicum involves preparing memoranda on various issues for the Legal Department of the World Bank under the supervision of Professor Ginsburg. Students work in small teams to analyze an array of policy and legal issues. Past topics have ranged from an analysis of sovereign wealth, to lending in post-conflict zones, to a study of remedies. The course is limited to a small number of students each quarter. The course will involve teams of two students preparing a research memo.  In class participation and memo quality are used to evaluate a student's grade.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2017, Thomas Ginsburg
  • Winter 2018, Thomas Ginsburg
  • Spring 2018, Thomas Ginsburg
  • Autumn 2018, Thomas Ginsburg
  • Spring 2019, Thomas Ginsburg
  • Spring 2021, Thomas Ginsburg

Writing and Research in the US Legal System

In this seminar, international LLM students learn research and writing skills essential to the practice of U.S. law. Students learn how to use these skills to win arguments, persuade clients and sharpen their own thinking. We discuss and practice the major principles of legal writing in plain English - no jargon, no legalese. The class functions largely as a workshop where we apply multiple research techniques and analyze the impact of various writing styles. Students meet individually with the instructor throughout the course. Regular class attendance is mandatory. Students must complete all assignments before the take-home examination, which determines the student's grade. This class is open only to LLM students and satisfies the legal research and writing prerequisite for the New York Bar exam. This class has a final take-home examination.

Previously:

  • Autumn 2017, Elizabeth Duquette and Margaret Schilt
  • Winter 2018, Elizabeth Duquette and Margaret Schilt
  • Autumn 2018, Elizabeth Duquette and Margaret Schilt
  • Winter 2019, Elizabeth Duquette and Margaret Schilt
  • Autumn 2019, Elizabeth Duquette and Margaret Schilt
  • Winter 2020, Elizabeth Duquette and Scott Vanderlin
  • Autumn 2020, Elizabeth Duquette and Ariel Alice Erbacher