The “Construction in Space in the Third and Fourth Dimension” statue by Antoine Pevsner sits in the Law School's reflecting pool with the sun behind it.
Intellectual. Interdisciplinary. Innovative. Impactful.

In the wake of U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat on social media to destroy an entire civilization ahead of a fragile Iran ceasefire, legal experts are questioning whether such incendiary language can amount to a war crime — even if it is never carried out...

“The U.S. stands out because it historically has aggressively demanded that other countries comply with international law while excepting itself from key provisions and treaties,” Eric Posner, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, told POLITICO.

During the arguments, the justices cast doubt on Trump’s bid to limit birthright citizenship.

While the concept is relatively are rare around the world, about three dozen countries guarantee citizenship to children born on their territory.

The U.S. as a birthright ‘outlier’

Only a couple dozen countries around the world have birthright citizenship, which Sauer said makes the U.S. “an outlier among modern nations.”

The California case was the first trial of thousands of consolidated lawsuits filed by teenagers, school districts and state attorneys general against Meta, YouTube, TikTok and Snap. More trials are scheduled for this year. TikTok and Snap settled the first case but are on the hook for the others.
Omri Ben-Shahar, a law professor at the University of Chicago, said the verdicts reflect an expansive view on tech companies’ liability for their products.
“What is new is the addiction element,” he said. “That could create a very broad liability.
4/21


Room V
Participating faculty: Tom Ginsburg

4/23


Room III
Participating faculty: Jacob Goldin, Jonathan S. Masur, Jennifer Nou, Randal C. Picker

4/24


Room V
Participating faculty: William Baude